You have requested access to member only content.
California appellate court upholds judgment on peer review hearing process
The California Court of Appeals, First Appellate District, affirmed a district court's judgment regarding a physician's claim that his peer review hearing violated his due process and his subsequent suspension was not supported by substantial evidence. The court concluded there was no evidence of financial bias on the part of the hospital board or hearing panel members.
This is an excerpt from a members-only article. Please log in or become a member to read the complete article.
Please Log In
Unable to log in?
Click here to reset your password or unlock your account.
Forgot your username?
Contact customer care at customerservice@hcpro.com or call 800-650-6787, between 8 AM - 5 PM CT
Not a member? Let's fix that!
A membership to Credentialing Resource Center (CRC) provides credentialing and medical staff professionals with a searchable database of continuously updated tools, best practice strategies, and compliance tips developed by industry experts. With three levels of membership, you can choose the solution that works best for you!
Register to access the free content available through the CRC site or become a member today. Click here for more information.
For questions and support, please call CRC customer service: 800-650-6787.