Family aims to take down military malpractice shield

The Feres Doctrine protects military medical personnel from medical malpractice lawsuits. The 1950 Supreme Court ruling equates injuries from medical mistakes with battlefield wounds, but many argue that the doctrine is out of date, including the family of 25-year old Air Force Staff Sgt. Dean Patrick Witt, who died after a nurse anesthetist inserted a breathing tube down his esophagus, rather than his trachea, during a routine appendectomy, reports Insurance Journal. A federal court denied the Witt’s family’s claim of malpractice, but the family has appealed; the Supreme Court will make a decision next month. 

Those who support the Feres Doctrine say that overturning it could cost the government $135 million each year defending malpractice claims and that military personnel who are injured in hospitals will have greater redress than soldiers who are wounded on the battle field. Those who oppose the doctrine say that military hospitals have less motivation to implement quality initiatives without the possible consequence of malpractice claims.