You have requested access to member only content.
Medical Staff Briefing, November 2012
Peer review is intended to maintain a standard of quality within a healthcare institution by identifying any issues among physicians and addressing them accordingly. Hospitals aim to resolve any concerns before the issues result in an adverse recommendation affecting clinical privileges or a peer review hearing. Unfortunately, hearings do occasionally occur, and when they do, it is important for the medical staff services department to present a complete and accurate record of interactions with the physician, particularly if the physician has a history of problem behavior or quality of care issues. Thus, accurate and thorough documentation is a crucial part of the peer review process. MSB spoke with legal experts to find out what information must be documented and why.
This is an excerpt from a members-only article. Please log in or become a member to read the complete article.
Please Log In
Unable to log in?
Click here to reset your password or unlock your account.
Forgot your username?
Contact customer care at customerservice@hcpro.com or call 800-650-6787, between 8 AM - 5 PM CT
Not a member? Let's fix that!
A membership to Credentialing Resource Center (CRC) provides credentialing and medical staff professionals with a searchable database of continuously updated tools, best practice strategies, and compliance tips developed by industry experts. With three levels of membership, you can choose the solution that works best for you!
Register to access the free content available through the CRC site or become a member today. Click here for more information.
For questions and support, please call CRC customer service: 800-650-6787.