Hospitals, health systems, and delegated credentialing

The healthcare industry continues to evolve, and many healthcare systems and hospitals are seeking opportunities to become more fully integrated and to achieve greater efficiencies among their various facilities, departments, and functions. For example, integration between medical staff services and provider enrollment for a hospital’s employed practitioners is increasing due to the similarity in information required for both processes. A growing trend to further streamline provider enrollment is for hospitals and health systems to seek delegated credentialing from commercial payers on behalf of their medical groups or other provider organizations, such as a physician hospital organization or independent practice association.

Hospitals and healthcare systems that obtain delegated credentialing from payers have the opportunity to gain more efficiency and improve their revenue cycles. Establishing credentialing policies and procedures that are also compliant with NCQA, URAC, and/or CMS provides healthcare organizations with a mechanism to streamline the provider enrollment process for their employed practitioners. Most often, the employed practitioner’s approval date with the organization becomes the participation start date with the payers, allowing reimbursement for services much earlier than with a traditional provider enrollment process. Delegation can positively affect an organization’s revenue cycle by reducing the uncollectable accounts receivable or claim holds that stem from delays incurred while payers perform their own credentialing process after the practitioner has already been credentialed at the hospital. Note: Contracted practitioners might also be considered for delegated credentialing in addition to employed practitioners, but may depend upon the contracting arrangements with payers.

There are many components that hospitals need to evaluate when considering whether to pursue delegated credentialing with commercial payers. Medical staff bylaws and credentialing policies are not typically designed to meet the accrediting and regulatory requirements of health plans and may require updates to achieve compliance. And although there are many similarities between hospital and health plan verification processes, such as elements verified and sources used, there are other requirements that are unique to managed care accreditation standards that affect delegation, such as a well-documented credentialing plan that includes verification time frames, practitioner notifications and rights, nondiscrimination, and confidentiality processes.

Source: Credentialing for Managed Care: Compliant Processes for Health Plans and Delegated Entities

Did you know?

Platinum Plus members of the Credentialing Resource Center (CRC) have unrestricted access to CRC’s ever-growing collection of ebooks, including Credentialing for Managed Care: Compliant Processes for Health Plans and Delegated Entities? To learn more about your current CRC benefits, click here. To join or renew your membership to the premier destination for credentialing, privileging, and peer review expertise, click here.