Complimentary White Paper: Resolve Pink Flags on Medical Staff Applications

Without a thorough credentialing process, medical staff leaders and MSPs may allow underqualified or undesirable practitioners to receive clinical privileges. Loss of licensure, significant malpractice activity, and poor clinical references are obvious targets of scrutiny. But what about the subtler inconsistencies and deviations that can surface on a medical staff application? Swift identification and targeted action can assuage concerns about these "pink flags" early in the game, promoting patient safety and preserving the integrity of the vetting process.

In this complimentary Q&A, Carol Cairns, CPMSM, CPCS, expert speaker at the 2017 Credentialing Resource Center Symposium, provides practical guidance on addressing pink flags. Learn how to identify, investigate, and report these early warning signs before they become full-blown problems.

Click here to download the complimentary white paper.

Related Content: 

Complimentary White Paper: 5 Steps for Effective Telemedicine Credentialing, Privileging, and Peer Review
Anatomy of an application: Red flags