Check out (and contribute to) the latest conversations happening now on the CRC Forums. Don't forget that you can also ask your question there at...Read More »
Bias is a common stumbling block to effective peer review. Bias can take a well-meaning committee that is truly focused on improvement and make it...Read More »
The primary question a physician reviewer is trying to answer is whether a physician’s actions and decisions were appropriate independent of the...Read More »
Understand the circumstances under which the peer review committee typically recommends external peer review to the medical executive committee (...Read More »
It is wise to have potential external peer reviewers in mind because the need for them can arise without warning. A good external peer review...Read More »
Consider fortifying focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE) materials with provisions specifically for practitioners whose privileges have...Read More »
The Hardenbergh Group recently conducted a webinar on leadership orientation for medical staff leaders, involving oversight, accountability, and...Read More »
Historically, members of the medical staff have been expected to donate time to the peer review process, including time as a proctor. However, in...Read More »
One of the key committees for many medical staffs is the peer review committee. This may either be a single committee for the entire medical staff...Read More »